三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Manila has no locus standi in sea case

By Zhou Jiang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-11 07:35

A Foreign Ministry document on the Philippines' move to take the South China Sea dispute to an international tribunal for arbitration reiterates that China will not accept, let alone participate, in such kind of adjudication. The document, issued on Sunday, explains why the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the dispute.

Aside from the greater issues Manila's arbitration request involves, the "mandatory arbitration" it is seeking before fulfilling some prior procedural obligations is also an important reason why the tribunal should not take up the case. According to Article 288 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, whether or not a court or tribunal has jurisdiction over any dispute between parties depends on whether the dispute is submitted in accordance with part XV of the Convention. And Article 286 also says that any dispute on the interpretation or application of the Convention shall, where no settlement has been reached by recourse to section 1, be submitted at the request of any party to the dispute to the court or tribunal having jurisdiction under this section.

A study of the relevant clauses of the document shows Manila has not fulfilled the obligations of "settling the dispute by peaceful means" and "exchanging views with other parties to the dispute" before taking the dispute to the tribunal.

According to Article 279 of the Convention and Clause 33 of the UN Charter, peaceful means to resolve the dispute include talks, investigations, mediation, arbitration, judicial settlement and other peaceful means agreed to by the disputing parties. But despite the inclusion of "arbitration", the Article excludes "mandatory arbitration", which Manila seeks.

Article 279 states only sketchily that parties should settle a dispute on the interpretation and/or application of the Convention through peaceful means in accordance with relevant international documents, and Article 298 and other articles present supplementary statements on matters such as how to choose peaceful means. For example, Articles 280 and 281 encourage relevant parties to resolve their disputes peacefully through the negotiation means they agree to.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Considering money as the end is the tragedy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美黄色一级视频 | 2022国产情侣真实露脸在线 | 欧美日韩在线观看免费 | 免费成人福利视频 | 欧美精品做人一级爱免费 | 91视频国产高清 | 国产区精品福利在线观看精品 | 一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片 | 亚洲第一区视频在线观看 | 九九视频只有精品 | 美国毛片毛片全部免费 | 中国精品 | 国产91色综合久久免费分享 | 网友自拍视频精品区 | 美国一级片免费 | 手机能看的黄色网址 | 爱爱小视频免费体验区在线观看 | 91精品福利久久久 | 国产一级爱c片免费播放 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕在线 | 亚洲小视频| 放几个免费的毛片出来看 | 午夜精品久久久久久99热7777 | 日本黄大片在线观看 | h网站免费在线观看 | 日韩精品久久久久影院 | 91香蕉在线视频 | 中国一级特黄真人毛片免费看 | 一本大道在线观看 | 国产毛片毛片精品天天看 | 亚洲高清免费在线观看 | 免费黄色在线观看视频 | 国产欧美在线观看精品一区二区 | 黄色三级视频在线播放 | 亚洲狠狠搞 | 农村妇女野外牲交一级毛片 | 国产精品视频成人 | 欧美另类综合 | 国产精品一区二区三区免费 | 国产视频91在线 | 91精品久久久久亚洲国产 |