三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Editorials

Defend fairness of exams

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-06-09 08:10

Different people have different expectations of the annual national college entrance exams. But for students who sit the exams, high scores are solely what they expect or hope for. The fact that exam results will make a difference to their future, unless there is a reform to subvert its basic model, points to the stupidity of the argument that the current exams are the culprit for the country's lack of first-class scientists and thinkers.

Finger-pointing at the exam model has resulted in high-pitched demand for reform of the model, but it seems that very few know what kind of changes should be made to the current system, in which candidates' exam results solely decide which universities they will enter.

The autonomy some universities have been granted to enroll a certain percentage of students on their own, for the purpose of paving the way for a multiple means of college enrollment, has actually provided opportunities for rent seeking on the part of both the institutions of higher learning and those who can afford to buy their children's way into prestigious universities.

Whether such autonomy should be taken away from the hands of universities remains a question, but what sparks controversy is the practice by 16 provinces and municipalities including Beijing to give extra scores to exam candidates who are appraised as models of ethical behavior and moral integrity.

The problem is who has the power to decide which student is such a model and what are the criteria. If such a practice is just a way for some people with wealth or other resources to lubricate their children's way into prestigious universities, such a practice will become morally corrupt in the name of giving credit to students that are role models.

It is indeed necessary to make changes to the current exam model so that multiple criteria apply in the enrollment of students. Yet, such changes should never open the door to corruption or erode the fairness of the exams.

If there cannot be enough transparency and supervision over a university's autonomy to enroll students on their own or other ways of appraising the qualities of candidates, the national college entrance exam model may have to remain as it is until the conditions become ripe for reform.

That many Chinese graduates have developed well in the Western countries points to the fact that this exam model is not that bad and does help foster a lot of candidates with excellent talents.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 特级黄aaaaaaaaa毛片 | 香港午夜理理伦_级毛片 | 黄色一级网址 | 亚洲精品国产第一区第二区国 | 午夜精品久久久久久91 | 亚洲精品第一页中文字幕 | 精品久久久久久国产 | 天天久久 | 中国欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 欧美一级高清片在线 | 国产做a视频免费观看 | 日韩亚洲一区二区三区 | 日本高清www午色夜黄 | 亚洲经典一区 | 成年女人免费看片 | 国产视频在线一区 | 久久免费精品视频在线观看 | 韩国福利影视一区二区三区 | 蜜桃成人精品 | 国模私拍高清大胆专业网站 | 岛国毛片在线观看 | 亚洲高清一区二区三区久久 | 成年看片免费高清观看 | 国产视频一区在线 | 黄色一级毛片网站 | a大片久久爱一级 | 久久精品久久久久久久久人 | 国产福利在线观看一区二区 | 欧美日韩第一区 | 外国黄色一级 | 久久国产99 | 日本黄色大片免费观看 | 国产系列在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲麻豆小说 | 一级做a爱过程免费视频超级 | 国产一级二级三级 | 美国a级 | 国产97视频在线观看 | 国内精品九一在线播放 | 妞干网免费视频在线观看 | 网友自拍区一区二区三区 |