三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Finance

IPO reforms draw skepticism in some quarters

By Yang Ziman | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-24 07:20

To guarantee fair pricing, the CSRC reform states that individual investors should be included in the price-setting process.

At least 20 individual or institutional investors are required for issues of less than 400 million shares. At least 50 such investors are required for larger issues.

Xiong Jinqiu, a financial expert, said the reform proposals place too much emphasis on prevention rather than punishment.

Overpriced new issues will only be temporarily suspended, at best. For instance, when new share prices rose last year, the CSRC concluded after a brief investigation that prices were being pushed up by many individual shareholders.

It did not occur to the commission, Xiong said, that the individuals might be acting collectively on behalf of a "price-rigging mastermind".

Since IPO reform no longer produces significant results, said Xiong, the CSRC should instead take tough steps to crack down on secondary market price manipulation to end fraudulent behavior.

The draft reforms also said that applicants waiting for IPO approval could issue bonds in the meantime to diversify their financing sources. Once approval is obtained, companies can choose the timing of the issue on their own.

Abolishing 'redline'

Further, the proposed reforms abolish the "25 percent" redline. According to IPO policies that prevailed last year, if the price-earnings ratio of the IPO is 25 percent higher than for comparable companies, the issuer must call a board meeting and submit an explanation to the CSRC. In that situation, the commission could order the issuer to reset the IPO price. Now, issuers would only have to release an explanation for the above-average prices and warn investors of potential risks.

Some analysts see the entire reform package as nothing more than tinkering with technical problems. Hua Sheng, a veteran economist and president of the Beijing Yanjing Overseas Chinese University, said that the proposal does not touch the most important issue - approval rights. The decision on conducting an IPO remains in the hands of the CSRC, rather than the market.

Lin Yixiang, chair of Beijing-based TX Investment Consulting, agreed with Hua's opinion that the reform sidesteps the question of "who decides who can go public". If the approval process remains the same, it is hard to make any breakthroughs.

Hua and Lin suggest the regulatory should loosen its control and leave it to the issuers and buyers themselves to decide when to go public, at whatever price, and whether or not the stocks are worth buying.

Xiong, however, is against the idea of loosening administrative power prematurely. The mainland stock market is still in its infancy, he said, and without CSRC oversight, issuers wouldn't wait to go public at any time, regardless of market conditions. This is because once listed, issuers have many prerogatives.

When companies see the stock market as an ideal place to rip off ignorant investors, lack of government involvement will do more harm than good.

Apart from increasing the accountability of issuers and underwriters, Ke Jingmin, a financial commentator, said the regulator itself should assume more responsibility.

Based on the principle of "with power comes responsibility", the CSRC must be accountable for giving the green light to IPO applicants who are later involved in fraudulent conduct.

The current system misleads investors into believing that companies that passed the CSRC's approval process are trustworthy, Ke said.

However, scandals such as those involving Green-land Biological Technology and Wanfu Biotechnology demonstrate that the CSRC's endorsement can't necessarily be relied on. The agency needs to be responsible for any approval it is going to grant, Ke added.

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 毛片大全免费看 | 欧美人七十二式性视频教程一 | 国产毛片片精品天天看视频 | 黑人和黑人激情一级毛片 | 欧美视频在线一区二区三区 | 国产美女亚洲精品久久久综合 | 看黄视频在线观看 | 97精品视频在线 | 成人午夜亚洲影视在线观看 | 不卡一区在线观看 | 亚洲人成网站999久久久综合 | 狠狠久久 | 又大又爽又湿又紧a视频 | 精品国产福利久久久 | 91精品福利老司机在线观看 | 国产成人综合亚洲欧美在 | 免费a级特黄国产大片 | 免费国产精成人品 | 欧美日韩免费在线视频 | 美国a视频 | 国产毛片一级 | 亚洲成人第一页 | 国产成人精品免费影视大全 | 一级一级人与动毛片 | 1769国内精品免费视频视频 | 欧美亚洲国产第一页草草 | 国产上床视频 | 天天看黄 | 国产麻豆精品原创 | 免费一级做a爰片性视频 | 日本免费网站 | 国产成人综合久久精品亚洲 | 免费视频黄 | 中国xxx片 | 中文字幕在线播放视频 | 久久黄色网址 | 一区二区不卡免费视频 | 在线观看网站黄 | 99超级碰碰成人香蕉网 | 成人做爰网站免费看 | 免费视频不卡一区二区三区 |