三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Top Biz News

New Chinese green bond standards backed by the industry

By Cecily Liu (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2016-03-04 22:43

New national green bond standards rolled out by the Chinese government in December gained industry endorsement and analysts say they will drive forward the harmonization of green bond standards globally.

The global green bonds market, which started in 2008 with bonds issued by the World Bank, boomed in recent years but its fast growth is being hampered due to the lack of universal standards globally.

Central to the issue is a lack of commonly agreed definition of what projects are considered to be green, and the procedure of certifying that money raised from bond issuances is indeed used to fund the projects they've promised to fund.

"The Chinese standards are very useful to drive forward China's green bond market because it identifies areas where investments would lead to improvement of environment, setting up a detailed and clear direction to channel funds into," says Christopher Flensborg, head of sustainable products and product development at the Stockholm based SEB.

Flensborg says he expects other national governments to follow China's lead in issuing national standards unique to their country specific situations, which will efficiently channel funds into each country for green industries that most need financial support in order to grow.

Internationally, two sets of standards already exist. The Green Bond Principles (GBP), led by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), is a more broad-based set that suggests the procedures for designating, disclosing, managing and reporting on the proceeds of a green bond. ICMA is a Zurich based self-governing organization, representing capital market companies across 15 regions.

As the GBP is less specific about what industries are acceptable for green investments, London-based non-government organization Climate Bond Initiative (CBI) has initiated its own set of standards, which are more specific in defining projects that it considers to be green. Examples of eligible categories include solar, geothermal, low carbon transport, water, bio-energy, amongst others.

Wang Yao, deputy secretary general of China's Green Finance Committee, which is under the leadership of PBoC, says the newly released Chinese standards are coherent with GBP and has great similarities with CBI. Uniquely, it also takes into account China's industrial structure and specific clean energy market situations, making it practical and handy to use by Chinese green bond issuers.

As well, the Chinese standards could prove useful for international organizations issuing onshore renminbi green bonds in China (known as panda bonds), which is expected to be a trend as China further liberalizes its capital markets, says Wang, who is also director of the Research Center for Climate and Energy Finance at the Central University of Finance and Economics, a think tank.

"The Chinese green bond market has great policy support and huge potential, and has attracted wide global investor attention. Currently many international organizations expressed great interest in issuing green panda bonds in China, so it would prove useful for them to follow the Chinese standards in their use of proceeds, due diligence, information disclosure and certification," Wang says.

The Chinese green bond standards have a catalogue which classifies projects into 31 types under six categories: energy conservation, pollution control, resource conservation and recycling, clean transport, clean energy, and ecological conservation and adaptation.

Essentially it is a comprehensive definition of which green bonds investments are acceptable, and the standards can be used by authorized third party certifying organizations to check if the bond proceeds are invested in acceptable green projects.

"What the Chinese government has provided is one set of criteria which is simple, understandable and specific, especially with its six main endorsed green bond project categories," says Huo Rongrong, Global Head of China and RMB Business for Capital Financing at HSBC.

In April 2015, HSBC hosted a one-day forum in Beijing on sustainable financing, which was the first of its kind and well attended by Chinese policy makers, banks, insurance firms, corporate and public sector clients, and greatly contributed towards the dialogue of China's policy drive on green finance.

In particular, the six categories identified by the Chinese government would efficiently help drive investment into broad areas in China's green transition that are most urgently in need of money, by signaling to investors the key promising areas in China's green transitioning, Huo ways.

Huo says that regardless of where a specific green bond is issued, many of the projects to be funded with the bond proceeds will physically be based in China, so using the Chinese standards to certify them would make sense. More frequent use of the Chinese standards would increase its prominence internationally in the future, driving forward the standards harmonization trend.

Sean Kidney, CEO and Co-founder of the Climate Bond Initiative, said the Chinese standards greatly overlap with the CBI standards. He said some items in the Chinese catalogue will be useful for international use, and his team will consider these items when updating CBI standards. These will include criteria around flood protection measures, waste recycling and fish farms.

Kidney says China's inclusion of coal and gas in its catalogue is understandable with its energy transition, but these are not included in international standards as international priorities differ. "In China, reducing air pollution with a shift to lower-pollutant coal power remains part of energy mix transition-planning. The international discussion is more focused on the need to phase out greenhouse gas emissions from coal power."

Currently one key controversy regarding the Chinese standards is the inclusion of clean coal, which the international community believes should be excluded. China argues that the financing of clean coal is important for the country to shift its heavy reliance away from traditional coal sources, which account for about two thirds of China's energy consumption.

"Fundamentally China's energy mix is in transition, and as we cannot move to large scale consumption of renewable energy at once, to make a shift to clean coal will help with the transition. This would probably be the same situation faced by many other emerging economies as well," says Wang.

Kidney says China's inclusion of coal and gas in its catalogue is understandable with its energy transition, but these are not included in international standards as international priorities differ. "In China, reducing air pollution with a shift to lower-pollutant coal power remains part of energy mix transition planning. The international discussion is more focused on the need to phase out greenhouse gas emissions from coal power."

But some industry analysts disagree. Nick Mabey, chief executive and a founder of Third Generation Environmentalism, believes that China should exclude clean coal from its catalogue for its green bond market to attract investment from international investors.

"The question is not a scientific argument of whether clean coal is green. Rather, China needs to recognize that international investors do not accept that coal as green, so this will limit international investors' appetite. China should make its standards easy to understand and acceptable by investors internationally and fund clean coal through other means," Mabey says.

Mabey says he believes convergence of green bond standards internationally is very important because projects funded by international financial institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank would be funded by a global investor base, and coherent standards for these projects would help investors accept green bonds' as an asset class faster.

"As the green bond community is still so young globally, there are still many debates within the industry concerning whether coherent standards are required. The world is looking to China's presidency of the G20 to take this discussion forward and hopefully reach a viable solution," he says.

To contact the reporter: cecily.liu@mail.chinadailyuk.com

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费特黄一级欧美大片 | 成年女人免费看片 | 伊人毛片| 国产高清乱码无卡女大生 | 男女性高爱潮免费的国产 | 在线免费看黄的网站 | 欧美亚洲免费 | 奥田咲在线播放 | 国外免费一级 | 国产精品九九视频 | 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合 | 国产麻豆91网在线看 | 国产精品不卡在线 | 无遮挡高清一级毛片免费 | 国产成人h片视频在线观看 国产成人lu在线视频 | 日韩国产综合 | 亚洲天堂一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲国产成人久久99精品 | 免费看黄色片 | 久久国产精品国产自线拍免费 | 亚洲一区二区在线播放 | 久久婷婷综合中文字幕 | 国产精品国产三级在线专区 | 高清配种视频xxxxx | 成年女人天堂香蕉网视频 | chinese国产在线视频 | 欧美一区二区在线播放 | 国产精品夜间视频香蕉 | 欧美亚洲色图视频 | 亚洲一区二区精品 | 欧美videos另类hd肥妇色 | 女人大毛片一级毛片一 | 欧美日韩国产精品自在自线 | 一区亚洲 | 国产欧美精品国产国产专区 | 欧美精品片| 狠狠五月天中文字幕 | 欧美福利片在线观看 | 色综合一区二区三区 | 免费观看成人碰视频公开 | 久草福利在线 |