三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Finance

LPR reform confirms domestic orientation of monetary policy

By Zhu Haibin | China Daily | Updated: 2019-11-04 10:10
Share
Share - WeChat
A clerk counts cash at a bank in Huaibei, Anhui province. [Photo provided to China Daily]

On Aug 17, the People's Bank of China, the central bank, announced it will re-benchmark the loan prime rate or LPR on the basis of one-year medium-term lending facility or MLF rate (previously on the basis of benchmark lending rate).

The LPR will be quoted on the 20th of each month. In August and September, the LPR was lowered by 6 basis points and 5 basis points, respectively. This was widely perceived as an important step forward in the interest rate liberalization, and also a new form of rate cuts.

The LPR reform is an important effort to address the interest rate segmentation problem - that is, the coexistence and divergence between two sets of interest rates.

One set of interest rates relates to banks' loan pricing, which is based on the benchmark lending rate announced by the PBOC.

The other set of interest rates relates to funding cost in the financial market - that is, in money market and bond yields, which are largely affected by the central bank's open market operations and various lending facilities.

By artificially bridging between the LPR and MLF interest rates, the LPR reform aims to reduce (or remove) the non-synchronism between the two sets of interest rates.

The LPR reform also provides the opportunity window for banks to lower the average lending rate to corporates as called for by policymakers, especially to private companies and small and micro enterprises. Indeed, the LPR has been lowered by 11 basis points in the past two months and a further small reduction is likely, we think. Nonetheless, the room for rate cuts is limited.

Despite the call for reduction in bank lending rate, the PBOC also sent a very clear signal that benchmark deposit rates will stay unchanged, so the rate cut is asymmetric and any further rate cut will be at the cost of banks' net interest margin or NIM compression.

Average NIM for Chinese banks was about 2.2 percent before the LPR reform, roughly in line with its 10-year average and slightly above the average of international peers (around 2 percent).

Therefore, among the current wave of central bank easing, the PBOC's rate cut is perhaps the weakest version as it is implicit (reduction in the LPR but not the policy rate), gradual (unit change is only 5 basis points) and limited.

This suggests that the PBOC monetary policy decision is mainly domestic-oriented, rather than in response to common global shocks.

Rate cuts can be justified by the downward pressure on the economy, a joint force of: i) business cycle slowdown due to weakening profitability and investment incentive; ii) long-term structural slowdown accompanied by economic transformation; iii) the turnaround of the financial cycle since 2017 from expansionary to prudent regulation; and iv) the uncertainty and volatility related to a changing US-China relationship. Rate cuts can be part of counter-cyclical macro policy, supporting domestic demand via lower funding cost for the real economy.

Meanwhile, from a financial stability perspective, a rate cut is also helpful to reduce the interest repayment burden of debt outstanding, buying extra time to push forward structural reforms and prevent the occurrence of systemic risks.

But domestic considerations also limit the room for rate cuts. On the one hand, funding cost is not the main constraint to domestic demand. Instead, fiscal policy will take the front seat in the current round of policy easing, including a large-scale tax cut this year and fiscal support for infrastructure activity and consumption.

On the other hand, from a financial stability perspective, excessive rate cuts not only run the risk of re-igniting asset price inflation, but also compromise the incentive for key structural reform.

For example, a much lower interest rate will mitigate the debt service burden and hence weaken the incentive to address the soft budget constraint for State-owned enterprises and local government entities, which is key to resolving China's debt concern in the long run.

Domestic orientation of monetary policy also implies that the PBOC will choose a combination of independent monetary policy, increasing yuan flexibility and capital outflow restrictions in the "impossible trinity" (or trilemma, which refers to the notion that it is impossible for a country to have a stable currency, an independent monetary policy and the free movement of capital - the absence of capital controls - at the same time).

A more flexible exchange rate is the primary reaction to changing expectations on US-China trade tension risks.

Since May 2018, the yuan has depreciated against the US dollar (from 6.33 to 7.15) and the exchange rate volatility has also increased. The depreciation trend coincides with the escalation of US-China trade tariff risks.

It is worth mentioning that, despite faster depreciation and higher exchange rate volatility in 2018-19 (versus 2015-16), the implied capital outflow is much lower (peak monthly outflow was around $20 billion per month in 2018-19, versus over $100 billion per month in 2015-16) and forex reserves have been stable.

This could be attributed to the following factors: i) increasing flexibility in exchange rate and less direct intervention by utilizing forex reserves; ii) the divergence in central bank policies and increases in interest-rate differentials (RMB versus USD), which provide fundamental support; iii) accelerated pace of capital account openness to attract inflows from global institutional investors and stricter restrictions on capital outflows from domestic investors.

The LPR reform is by no means an end to interest rate reform, and the PBOC's monetary policy operations still need to be improved, we believe.

First, financial market interest rate is not equivalent to market-based interest rate. For the latter, risk-based pricing is the key. Currently, the LPR is heavily influenced by the central bank's window guidance.

Second, financial market reform and monetary policy reform must be advanced simultaneously with the reform in real economy, most importantly SOE reform and fiscal reform to remove the soft budget constraint and ensure their operations are truly market-oriented and competition is fair and rule-based.

Last, the dual-track capital account approach is a realistic choice in the near term, but can hardly be sustainable. The asymmetric capital account liberalization could accumulate capital outflow pressure into the future and affect currency stability, and the risk should not be ignored.

The writer is chief China economist at J.P. Morgan.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 麻豆精品传媒成人精品 | 免费久 | 最新香蕉97超级碰碰碰碰碰久 | 亚洲综合久久久 | 中国精品视频一区二区三区 | 国产婷婷一区二区三区 | 欧美亚洲国产一区 | 视频一区二区三区欧美日韩 | 欧美女交 | 爱爱男女在线观看视频高清 | 麻豆传媒网站入口直接进入免费版 | 538prom在线 | 尤物视频在线观看网址 | 婷婷综合久久狠狠色99h | 日批日韩在线观看 | 色综合综合色 | 国产精品久久久久免费 | 国产精品一区二区免费福利视频 | 国产精品成人免费观看 | 二级特黄绝大片免费视频大片 | 成人黄色小视频在线观看 | 国产精品自产拍2021在线观看 | 男女无遮挡边做边吃视频免费 | 奇米影视亚洲狠狠色 | 欧美一级高清片免费一级 | 亚洲国产精品热久久2022 | 欧美黄三级在线观看 | 在线亚洲欧国产精品专区 | 免费无遮挡嘿嘿嘿视频动态 | 影音先锋5566手机在线播放 | 日本丶国产丶欧美色综合 | 久婷婷 | 一级免费黄色 | 老妇女人一级毛片 | 精品午夜寂寞影院在线观看 | wwww欧美| 免费看a级黄色片 | 免费看的黄色录像 | 四虎hk网址| 手机在线日韩高清理论片 | 欧美特黄三级成人 |